50% of SEO are outdated | Playing Catch up with Google!


 An Article from Web-Log @ http://www.learn-internet-marketing-free.com.

You have read many books on SEO and imitate techniques on your websites. Are you still thinking that these methods are valid? Are you still thinking that the books that you just read 2 months ago gave you an idea of SEO? Think again because 50% of SEO methods are outdated due to updates after updates from Google in countering our so-called SEO methods.

As we all know, Google takes up the majority of the search engine pie and most of us are optimizing our websites for Google. But we are always playing catch up with Google due to their updates. Last time round, Google is still accepting Meta tags but this isn’t the case anymore as they have scrapped that idea. Google has slapped companies that do the ‘black’ thing in list building. All these have made even the oustanding SEO gurus go nuts! Some SEO companies have even closed down.

But we have no choice but to play catch up with Google and make use of whatever tactics to go ahead of them. So are you still sure that the SEO books that you read 2 months ago are still valid? Internet Marketing world is the same as the Information Technology world whereby we have to continue learning everyday in order to survive. If not, we will be left behind. Therefore, learning internet marketing from the internet forums, blogs are the best bet for the latest trend in the internet marketing world.

A word of caution to the new players in internet marketing:-

Stand up, be on your guard and play the catch up with Google or ‘SWITCH’…

Last 5 posts by seanrasmussen

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Propeller
  • Scoopit
  • Simpy
  • StumbleUpon
  • Whizzoo
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Reddit


Leave a Reply